[Repost] Singapore supports 243 human rights recommendations, including stronger migrant worker protections – Channel News Asia

29 September 2026

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/migrant-workers-human-rights-un-6414541

29 September 2026

The country supported about 71 per cent of the recommendations it received, but did not back changes to domestic worker laws, the death penalty or free speech legislation.

SINGAPORE: Singapore supported recommendations from other United Nations member states on Monday (Sep 28) to strengthen migrant worker protections and improve mental health support for children, as part of its latest review of the country’s human rights record.

It also supported calls to consider ratifying international conventions covering migrant and domestic workers, ensure new technologies comply with human rights standards, and include vulnerable groups in climate change policies.

The commitments are among 243 recommendations Singapore supported following its fourth Universal Periodic Review, a UN mechanism that reviews each member state’s human rights record every four-and-a-half years. 

They account for about 71 per cent of the 342 recommendations Singapore received, up from 65 per cent during its previous review in 2021. 

Singapore’s permanent representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Mr Jaya Ratnam, said the country viewed the process as a platform for frank dialogue and approached it with an open mind.

“Our approach to human rights rests on a simple premise: progress should always be measured by tangible outcomes for our people,” he said at the adoption of Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review report in Geneva.

Singapore supported recommendations that complemented its efforts to build a more inclusive, cohesive and resilient society, Mr Ratnam added, citing education, public healthcare, support for lower-income groups, migrant worker welfare, labour rights and digital inclusion.

He said the country’s approach rested on two pillars – pragmatism and the rule of law – and that countries would take different paths to advancing human rights based on their circumstances.

“What matters is whether these approaches deliver meaningful progress for their people,” he said.

DOMESTIC WORKERS

Among the more specific recommendations supported by Singapore was one from the United Kingdom to mandate rest periods and create digital recruitment and wage-payment processes for foreign domestic workers. 

Singapore also supported recommendations to strengthen migrant workers’ protections in areas such as working conditions, healthcare, social protection, access to justice and safeguards against exploitation. These included improving migrant domestic workers’ legal protections, access to healthcare and mental health support.

However, it did not support some recommendations seeking specific changes to legal protections.

These included recommendations from Canada and Norway to extend protections under the Employment Act and Work Injury Compensation Act to domestic workers, and a recommendation to establish a government-run recruitment system to prevent deceptive hiring and contract substitution. 

Singapore also did not support a recommendation to give foreign domestic workers public holidays, regulated working hours and paid leave, and to end mandatory pregnancy and HIV testing.

In its response, Singapore said migrant domestic workers required “additional protection” and that their particular working environments were addressed through customised legislation under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act. 

MENTAL HEALTH, WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT

Singapore supported several recommendations on mental health, including calls to strengthen school-based support services for young people, increase awareness and develop community services.

It also backed a recommendation to protect children and older people from cyber harms while maintaining non-digital access to essential services.

Singapore also supported a broad range of recommendations on advancing women’s empowerment, including increasing women’s representation in public and political life, narrowing gender inequalities at work and strengthening support for women in leadership roles.

Other supported recommendations focused on balancing work and caregiving with stronger workplace protections relating to maternity, caregiving responsibilities and flexible work arrangements to raise women’s workforce participation.

In its national report for the review, Singapore pointed to measures such as the Workplace Fairness Act and expanded parental leave. Government-paid paternity leave doubled from two to four weeks last year, while shared parental leave rose to 10 weeks from April.

DEATH PENALTY, LGBT PROPOSALS NOT ACCEPTED

Most of the recommendations Singapore did not support fell into three broad areas: ratification of additional human rights treaties, abolition or restriction of the death penalty, and freedom of expression and assembly.

About a third of the recommendations it noted related to treaty ratification, Mr Ratnam said. 

Singapore does not regard treaty obligations as “an aspirational exercise”, he said, adding that the country would accede to treaties only when it was sure it could fully implement every aspect.

For many of the other recommendations, Singapore already had legislation and policies addressing their underlying objectives in ways suited to its social and cultural context, he added.

Singapore noted recommendations calling for a moratorium on or abolition of the death penalty. It said capital punishment was reserved for the most serious crimes, including murder and trafficking significant quantities of drugs, and was applied with due process and judicial safeguards.

It also did not support recommendations to legalise same-sex marriage, ban conversion practices or add sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics under the Workplace Fairness Act.

In its formal response, Singapore said: “All Singapore citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, are protected under our laws from discrimination and harassment. We will continue to address the concerns of the LGBT community in a sensitive and pragmatic way, protect the vulnerable, uphold the family and preserve the common space for the diverse communities in Singapore.”

On freedom of expression and assembly, Singapore supported recommendations to protect these rights and ensure relevant laws and policies comply with international human rights standards.

However, it did not support several recommendations calling for specific changes to laws such as the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act and the Public Order Act. 

The government said the rights to speech, expression and assembly were constitutionally guaranteed but not “unfettered”, and had to be exercised responsibly, particularly given Singapore’s multi-racial and multi-religious context.

Singapore said it was committed to implementing the 243 recommendations it supported. 


Statement on the Recent Charging of Human Rights Defenders in Singapore

28 September 2026

SINGAPORE — MARUAH Singapore notes with deep concern the recent charging and prosecution of several human rights defenders and social workers in September 2026 under the Public Order Act and related laws for their peaceful public assemblies, vigils, and advocacy.

Criminalizing peaceful advocacy such as holding vigils or delivering letters is a direct violation of the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly under Article 19 and 20 respectively of the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

The use of onerous and oppressive laws including a highly restrictive permit regime and the Public Order Act, which requires prior police authorization for even single-person or small-scale peaceful protests is in contradiction of UN commitments and directly contradict recommendations made by member states during Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the UN Human Rights Council in May 2026, which urged the nation to protect human rights defenders from legal reprisals.

Civil society plays a vital role in fostering an open, inclusive, and mature society. The right to voice dissenting opinions and engage in peaceful assembly without the fear of judicial harassment is a cornerstone of a democratic society. MARUAH calls upon the authorities to uphold international human rights standards, review existing legislation that disproportionately restricts public assembly, and foster an environment where civil society can engage constructively with the state and the public.


About MARUAH

MARUAH is a human rights non-governmental organisation based in Singapore. “Maruah” means “Dignity” in Malay. MARUAH works to promote and defend human rights at the national and regional levels.

Media Contact

For media inquiries or further information, please contact:Email: info@maruah.orgWebsite: http://www.maruah.org


[Repost] Amnesty International article – “Singapore: Drop wave of charges against activists”

15 September 2026

https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa36/1449/2026/en

10 September 2026


[Statement] Acquittal of the three women charged with organising a procession outside the Istana to publicise the cause of solidarity with Palestine

23 October 2025

We applaud the acquittal of Ms Mossammad Sobikun Nahar, Ms Siti Amirah Mohamed Asrori, and Ms Annamalai Kokila Parvathi on 21 October 2025 for their alleged organisation of a procession outside the Istana.

This case underscores the challenges activists face under the Public Order Act, where stringent permit requirements can inadvertently stifle legitimate advocacy, such as expressing solidarity with Palestine. While Singapore’s emphasis on public order is understandable, laws must balance security with the fundamental right to freedom of expression, as recognized in international human rights frameworks like the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, to which Singapore is a signatory.

We urge policymakers to review the clarity of regulations around prohibited areas and permit processes to prevent similar misunderstandings and ensure civic space for non-violent advocacy. The courage of these women also highlights the need for greater public awareness and dialogue on balancing civic freedoms with Singapore’s unique socio-political context. This acquittal is a step toward fostering a more inclusive environment for peaceful activism in Singapore.

MARUAH


(Updated with slides) The Public Order Act and its disempowering effect on Singapore – Sunday, 20 December 2020

10 December 2020

Please click on the links below to access a copy of the slides used by the speakers during their presentation.

Presentation by Priscilla Chia – “Public Order Act – Criminalising civil disobedience?”

Presentation by Howard Lee – “The Public Order Act – Media Analysis & Impact”

Once again, we thank our speakers, Ms Priscilla Chia and Mr Howard Lee, and all participants for making time this afternoon to discuss the impact of the misuse of the Public Order Act on political and social discourse in our country.

We look forward to having you join us again at our next event. Please keep a lookout on our Facebook page or here on this website for updates.

MARUAH Secretariat


We stand #InSolidarity for Civic Space

8 June 2020

#InSolidarity – Appeal for smiley images from Singaporeans

3 June 2020

As you are probably aware, Singapore civil and migrant workers’ rights activist Jolovan Wham is being investigated for holding up a placard with a smiley ☺ in a public space outside a police station. He was alone. You can read details of this on his Twitter account at https://twitter.com/jolovanwham/status/1263022005223165957

Several people have also expressed their support for a more open and accessible civic space by posting images of themselves with a smiley on their personal social media accounts. Others have also sent Jolovan Wham their own smiley photos for his Facebook page (https://m.facebook.com/jolovan.wham).

MARUAH, as a human rights organisation, states again that amendments to the Public Order Act (2017) mean further restrictions, crippling civic space. Human Rights Watch, in 2017, stated that Singapore’s definition of “public assembly” in the Public Order Act is extremely broad, which means that it can be interpreted to encompass everything from handing out leaflets on the death penalty to an individual standing silently holding a placard. (https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/12/12/kill-chicken-scare-monkeys/suppression-free-expression-and-assembly-singapore).

We would like to invite members and friends of MARUAH Singapore to show your support for civic space by submitting a photo of yourself with a smiley face. 

Here are two samples:

Smiley - sample 1
Smiley - sample 2

MARUAH Singapore will collate the photos into a Zoom-style layout with the following message – 

We support smileys and individuals’ peaceful voices in public.

#InSolidarity for Civic Space
#InSolidarity Against the Public Order Act(2017)

Please submit your images to maruahsg@gmail.com by Friday, 5 June 5.00pm. Do let us know if you need any further information.

Thanking you #InSolidarity, 

MARUAH Singapore