[Repost] Singapore supports 243 human rights recommendations, including stronger migrant worker protections – Channel News Asia

29 September 2026

https://www.channelnewsasia.com/singapore/migrant-workers-human-rights-un-6414541

29 September 2026

The country supported about 71 per cent of the recommendations it received, but did not back changes to domestic worker laws, the death penalty or free speech legislation.

SINGAPORE: Singapore supported recommendations from other United Nations member states on Monday (Sep 28) to strengthen migrant worker protections and improve mental health support for children, as part of its latest review of the country’s human rights record.

It also supported calls to consider ratifying international conventions covering migrant and domestic workers, ensure new technologies comply with human rights standards, and include vulnerable groups in climate change policies.

The commitments are among 243 recommendations Singapore supported following its fourth Universal Periodic Review, a UN mechanism that reviews each member state’s human rights record every four-and-a-half years. 

They account for about 71 per cent of the 342 recommendations Singapore received, up from 65 per cent during its previous review in 2021. 

Singapore’s permanent representative to the United Nations in Geneva, Mr Jaya Ratnam, said the country viewed the process as a platform for frank dialogue and approached it with an open mind.

“Our approach to human rights rests on a simple premise: progress should always be measured by tangible outcomes for our people,” he said at the adoption of Singapore’s Universal Periodic Review report in Geneva.

Singapore supported recommendations that complemented its efforts to build a more inclusive, cohesive and resilient society, Mr Ratnam added, citing education, public healthcare, support for lower-income groups, migrant worker welfare, labour rights and digital inclusion.

He said the country’s approach rested on two pillars – pragmatism and the rule of law – and that countries would take different paths to advancing human rights based on their circumstances.

“What matters is whether these approaches deliver meaningful progress for their people,” he said.

DOMESTIC WORKERS

Among the more specific recommendations supported by Singapore was one from the United Kingdom to mandate rest periods and create digital recruitment and wage-payment processes for foreign domestic workers. 

Singapore also supported recommendations to strengthen migrant workers’ protections in areas such as working conditions, healthcare, social protection, access to justice and safeguards against exploitation. These included improving migrant domestic workers’ legal protections, access to healthcare and mental health support.

However, it did not support some recommendations seeking specific changes to legal protections.

These included recommendations from Canada and Norway to extend protections under the Employment Act and Work Injury Compensation Act to domestic workers, and a recommendation to establish a government-run recruitment system to prevent deceptive hiring and contract substitution. 

Singapore also did not support a recommendation to give foreign domestic workers public holidays, regulated working hours and paid leave, and to end mandatory pregnancy and HIV testing.

In its response, Singapore said migrant domestic workers required “additional protection” and that their particular working environments were addressed through customised legislation under the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act. 

MENTAL HEALTH, WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT

Singapore supported several recommendations on mental health, including calls to strengthen school-based support services for young people, increase awareness and develop community services.

It also backed a recommendation to protect children and older people from cyber harms while maintaining non-digital access to essential services.

Singapore also supported a broad range of recommendations on advancing women’s empowerment, including increasing women’s representation in public and political life, narrowing gender inequalities at work and strengthening support for women in leadership roles.

Other supported recommendations focused on balancing work and caregiving with stronger workplace protections relating to maternity, caregiving responsibilities and flexible work arrangements to raise women’s workforce participation.

In its national report for the review, Singapore pointed to measures such as the Workplace Fairness Act and expanded parental leave. Government-paid paternity leave doubled from two to four weeks last year, while shared parental leave rose to 10 weeks from April.

DEATH PENALTY, LGBT PROPOSALS NOT ACCEPTED

Most of the recommendations Singapore did not support fell into three broad areas: ratification of additional human rights treaties, abolition or restriction of the death penalty, and freedom of expression and assembly.

About a third of the recommendations it noted related to treaty ratification, Mr Ratnam said. 

Singapore does not regard treaty obligations as “an aspirational exercise”, he said, adding that the country would accede to treaties only when it was sure it could fully implement every aspect.

For many of the other recommendations, Singapore already had legislation and policies addressing their underlying objectives in ways suited to its social and cultural context, he added.

Singapore noted recommendations calling for a moratorium on or abolition of the death penalty. It said capital punishment was reserved for the most serious crimes, including murder and trafficking significant quantities of drugs, and was applied with due process and judicial safeguards.

It also did not support recommendations to legalise same-sex marriage, ban conversion practices or add sexual orientation and gender identity as protected characteristics under the Workplace Fairness Act.

In its formal response, Singapore said: “All Singapore citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity, are protected under our laws from discrimination and harassment. We will continue to address the concerns of the LGBT community in a sensitive and pragmatic way, protect the vulnerable, uphold the family and preserve the common space for the diverse communities in Singapore.”

On freedom of expression and assembly, Singapore supported recommendations to protect these rights and ensure relevant laws and policies comply with international human rights standards.

However, it did not support several recommendations calling for specific changes to laws such as the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act and the Public Order Act. 

The government said the rights to speech, expression and assembly were constitutionally guaranteed but not “unfettered”, and had to be exercised responsibly, particularly given Singapore’s multi-racial and multi-religious context.

Singapore said it was committed to implementing the 243 recommendations it supported. 


[Statement] Response to the use of POFMA clause requiring The Online Citizen to publish a correction notice in The Straits Times over an article about the appointment of the attorney-general

4 April 2026

We refer to the Channel NewsAsia report, “TOC’s ‘persistent falsehoods’ prompt first use of POFMA clause requiring correction notice in Straits Times”, published on 25 March 2026.

We recognise the Government’s ongoing efforts to address misinformation and safeguard public discourse, including through the use of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA). The reported use of Section 11(3)(b), requiring a correction notice to be published in a specified print outlet, marks a significant development in the law’s application.

At the same time, measures adopted to counter falsehoods should remain necessary, proportionate, and consistent with the right to freedom of expression. Requiring publication in a mainstream newspaper may impose substantial financial costs on recipients—costs that may be beyond the means of many individuals, independent media outlets, and civil society organisations. Given that non-compliance constitutes a criminal offence, such directions may place considerable pressure on affected parties.

We also note that public authorities already have access to extensive communication channels to issue clarifications and corrections. It is therefore not always clear when more coercive measures are required, or how they address more complex challenges such as coordinated disinformation campaigns, including those involving foreign actors.

In practice, the burden of such directions is likely to fall disproportionately on smaller, local actors—independent media, civil society groups, opposition parties, and ordinary citizens. This may risk exacerbating existing power imbalances and could have a chilling effect on public participation.

In this regard, greater clarity on the thresholds, safeguards, and intended scope of such provisions would be helpful. Continued review, alongside engagement with a broad range of stakeholders, can support efforts to ensure that responses to misinformation remain balanced, transparent, and aligned with fundamental freedoms.

As Singapore continues to strengthen its approach to combating misinformation, we urge the Government to consider the importance that these efforts also uphold public trust and an open, inclusive civic space for all Singaporeans.

MARUAH


MARUAH’s Statement on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Bill

2 October 2021

Please click here to download MARUAH’s statement in PDF.


[Singapore Internet Watch] September Internet News Round-Up; Privacy and Security Resources for Civil Society

19 September 2021

This round-up covers issues ranging from crucial privacy/security resources for civil society, the Yale-NUS merger, and the latest use of POFMA. We have provided some excerpts from the round-up below. If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter, please click here.

Law and Digital Politics

The new foreign interference law: A new Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act has been introduced in Parliament. If passed, it will give the Singapore government the power to remove, change, or block “hostile” online information. As with POFMA, the bill’s impact on the shape of electronic communications will be noteworthy.

Sedition Act Repeal: The passage of more recent laws, such as POFMA has lessened the relevance of the Sedition Act, according to a bill introduced in Parliament to repeal it. However, with the Sedition Act’s repeal, the Criminal Procedure Code will be amended to make “ the deliberate wounding of any person’s religious or racial feelings” and “the promotion of disharmony” arrestable offences.

Crowdfunding for Damages to Singapore’s PM: The Online Citizen editor Terry Xu has been crowdfunding to pay for damages to PM Lee Hsien Loong, following 2 defamation lawsuits over TOC’s articles on the Lee siblings dispute.

Education

AI in Education: As part of Singapore’s National AI Strategy for education, MOE is exploring AI-enabled marking for English assignments and expects to integrate this into the Student Learning Space e-learning platform in 2 years.

Academic Freedom in Singapore: Academia.sg released their ground-breaking Academic Freedom Report. Check out this summary of key points from Yahoo Singapore: 78% of Singapore academics report at least ‘moderate’ interference: poll.

Yale-NUS Closure: read below for a compilation of recent analysis and commentary.

Business

Labour Protections for Platform Workers: Amidst a growing gig economy, PM Lee’s NDR speech addressed the precarity that platform workers face and acknowledged their need for better economic protections.

Manipulating Review Platforms: A Japanese restaurant in Singapore discovered that their negative online reviews it was receiving were actually their competitors trying to sabotage them. 

Security and Surveillance

Up to US$150,000 for Ethical Hackers: GovTech is launching a program to reward ethical hackers who find bugs and vulnerabilities in government websites and apps.

Autonomous Robots Patrolling the Heartland: This three week trial marks the first time “that an autonomous robot is being used to patrol and survey a public area with high foot traffic to enhance public health and safety”.


Singapore Internet Watch is a student-run group focusing on internet research. Their key focus areas include censorship, media regulation, misinformation and freedom of information.


The group believes in the need for open data and transparency in studying contentious issues at the intersection of Singapore’s internet and society.


Subscribe to their monthly newsletter to receive a round-up of the latest developments in Singapore’s media and politics, and updates on their work.