[Statement] Response to the use of POFMA clause requiring The Online Citizen to publish a correction notice in The Straits Times over an article about the appointment of the attorney-general

4 April 2026

We refer to the Channel NewsAsia report, “TOC’s ‘persistent falsehoods’ prompt first use of POFMA clause requiring correction notice in Straits Times”, published on 25 March 2026.

We recognise the Government’s ongoing efforts to address misinformation and safeguard public discourse, including through the use of the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act (POFMA). The reported use of Section 11(3)(b), requiring a correction notice to be published in a specified print outlet, marks a significant development in the law’s application.

At the same time, measures adopted to counter falsehoods should remain necessary, proportionate, and consistent with the right to freedom of expression. Requiring publication in a mainstream newspaper may impose substantial financial costs on recipients—costs that may be beyond the means of many individuals, independent media outlets, and civil society organisations. Given that non-compliance constitutes a criminal offence, such directions may place considerable pressure on affected parties.

We also note that public authorities already have access to extensive communication channels to issue clarifications and corrections. It is therefore not always clear when more coercive measures are required, or how they address more complex challenges such as coordinated disinformation campaigns, including those involving foreign actors.

In practice, the burden of such directions is likely to fall disproportionately on smaller, local actors—independent media, civil society groups, opposition parties, and ordinary citizens. This may risk exacerbating existing power imbalances and could have a chilling effect on public participation.

In this regard, greater clarity on the thresholds, safeguards, and intended scope of such provisions would be helpful. Continued review, alongside engagement with a broad range of stakeholders, can support efforts to ensure that responses to misinformation remain balanced, transparent, and aligned with fundamental freedoms.

As Singapore continues to strengthen its approach to combating misinformation, we urge the Government to consider the importance that these efforts also uphold public trust and an open, inclusive civic space for all Singaporeans.

MARUAH


MARUAH’s Statement on the Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Bill

2 October 2021

Please click here to download MARUAH’s statement in PDF.


[Singapore Internet Watch] September Internet News Round-Up; Privacy and Security Resources for Civil Society

19 September 2021

This round-up covers issues ranging from crucial privacy/security resources for civil society, the Yale-NUS merger, and the latest use of POFMA. We have provided some excerpts from the round-up below. If you would like to subscribe to the newsletter, please click here.

Law and Digital Politics

The new foreign interference law: A new Foreign Interference (Countermeasures) Act has been introduced in Parliament. If passed, it will give the Singapore government the power to remove, change, or block “hostile” online information. As with POFMA, the bill’s impact on the shape of electronic communications will be noteworthy.

Sedition Act Repeal: The passage of more recent laws, such as POFMA has lessened the relevance of the Sedition Act, according to a bill introduced in Parliament to repeal it. However, with the Sedition Act’s repeal, the Criminal Procedure Code will be amended to make “ the deliberate wounding of any person’s religious or racial feelings” and “the promotion of disharmony” arrestable offences.

Crowdfunding for Damages to Singapore’s PM: The Online Citizen editor Terry Xu has been crowdfunding to pay for damages to PM Lee Hsien Loong, following 2 defamation lawsuits over TOC’s articles on the Lee siblings dispute.

Education

AI in Education: As part of Singapore’s National AI Strategy for education, MOE is exploring AI-enabled marking for English assignments and expects to integrate this into the Student Learning Space e-learning platform in 2 years.

Academic Freedom in Singapore: Academia.sg released their ground-breaking Academic Freedom Report. Check out this summary of key points from Yahoo Singapore: 78% of Singapore academics report at least ‘moderate’ interference: poll.

Yale-NUS Closure: read below for a compilation of recent analysis and commentary.

Business

Labour Protections for Platform Workers: Amidst a growing gig economy, PM Lee’s NDR speech addressed the precarity that platform workers face and acknowledged their need for better economic protections.

Manipulating Review Platforms: A Japanese restaurant in Singapore discovered that their negative online reviews it was receiving were actually their competitors trying to sabotage them

Security and Surveillance

Up to US$150,000 for Ethical Hackers: GovTech is launching a program to reward ethical hackers who find bugs and vulnerabilities in government websites and apps.

Autonomous Robots Patrolling the Heartland: This three week trial marks the first time “that an autonomous robot is being used to patrol and survey a public area with high foot traffic to enhance public health and safety”.


Singapore Internet Watch is a student-run group focusing on internet research. Their key focus areas include censorship, media regulation, misinformation and freedom of information.


The group believes in the need for open data and transparency in studying contentious issues at the intersection of Singapore’s internet and society.


Subscribe to their monthly newsletter to receive a round-up of the latest developments in Singapore’s media and politics, and updates on their work.