[Repost] Statement – 9th Rohingya Genocide Remembrance Day: A Call for Justice and Accountability by the Women’s Peace Network

31 August 2026

Full statement in PDF

Today marks the 9th anniversary of the 2017 genocide against the Rohingya in Rakhine State. This Rohingya Genocide Remembrance Day stands as a crucial moment to not only look back at the atrocities that have occurred against the Rohingya in the past, but also a persecution that has continued since. As the conflict between the Arakan Army and Burmese military junta continues to rage, the Rohingya face a nexus of atrocities perpetrated by both sides. 

Reminiscent of the Burmese Army’s genocidal campaign in 2017, the Arakan Army has targeted Rohingya populated areas in Rakhine State since 2024. Rohingya in these areas have been subjected to grave atrocities including arson attacks, forced transfer and demographic change, torture, arbitrary arrest and detention, forced labor and recruitment, sexual and gender-based violence, along with massacres of hundreds of Rohingya. At the same time, the Junta commits atrocity crimes against the Rohingya during what they maintain are defensive actions against the enemy. Like the Arakan Army, these crimes constitute rape, looting, forced displacement, mass-killings, and forced recruitment. The Junta also maintains apartheid like conditions in Sittwe and other junta-controlled territories. Both sides’ actions appear to be part of an effort at erasing the identity of the Rohingya: physically, socially, and culturally. 

Consequently, besides violent acts, Rohingya are also subjected to systematic barriers to their continued survival. This is due to restrictions on their ability to create a livelihood, barriers to aid and vital resources, and overall conditions degrading the quality of life. The vulnerabilities of Rohingya in this situation make international response imperative. The patterns of persecution in the past persist today because perpetrators of genocide have not been held accountable. 

To end the patterns of persecution the Rohingya face, effective accountability measures must be put into place. In order for changes to occur, legal response as well as political, must demonstrate that what has occurred will not be tolerated nor allowed to continue. The perpetrators of the genocide in Myanmar and the ongoing crimes against the Rohingya: including the Arakan Army and Burmese military junta, should be processed. A necessary step for this accountability would be the expedition of the international justice process; including the International Criminal Court (ICC) and International Court of Justice (ICJ) processes, as Rohingya face increasing vulnerability. The United Nations Security Council should refer the situation of Myanmar to the ICC in order to prosecute the entirety of the crimes committed under the Rome Statute. 

Besides accountability, humanitarian aid must be increased as Rohingya internally and externally suffer under life threatening conditions. Inside Myanmar, conflict and barriers to resources such as blockages to aid, have left many Rohingya in jeopardy of disease and famine. Cross-border aid should be enabled with support from the international community and local civil society.

Outside of Myanmar in refugee camps, aid has to be given to supporting better infrastructure and creating proper habitation. Additional aid must be given to establish opportunities for Rohingya refugees. Education for children, programs aimed at promoting skills to build livelihoods and founding services to protect the most vulnerable in camps; particularly women and children, are all critical. Protections must also be put into place to serve Rohingya seeking refuge, including by taking measures against human trafficking networks according to the Bali Process, as well as cracking down on hate speech.

Ultimately, for change to occur the international community must involve the voices of the Rohingya who are the greatest stakeholders in plans for Myanmar’s future. The Rohingya once again face an existential threat and unless a new approach is taken history will continue to repeat itself. 

Women’s Peace Network


[International Criminal Court] Abd-Al-Rahman case : Trial to open on 5 April 2022

19 September 2021

Today, 8 September 2021, Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or “Court”) composed of Judge Joanna Korner, Presiding Judge, Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou and Judge Althea Violet Alexis-Windsor  scheduled the opening of the trial in the case  The Prosecutor v. Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (“Ali Kushayb”) for 5 April 2022.

Mr Abd-Al-Rahman was transferred to the ICC’s custody on 9 June 2020, after surrendering himself voluntarily in the Central African Republic. His initial appearance before the ICC took place on 15 June 2020. The confirmation of charges hearing was held before Pre-Trial Chamber II from 24 to 26 May 2021. On  9 July 2021, Pre-Trial Chamber II of the International Criminal Court unanimously, issued a decision confirming all the charges brought by the Prosecutor against Ali Muhammad Ali Abd-Al-Rahman (“Ali Kushayb”) and committed him to trial before a Trial Chamber.

The 31 charges include intentionally directing attacks against the civilian population as such, as a war crime; murder as a crime against humanity and as a war crime; pillaging as a war crime; destruction of the property of an adversary as a war crime; other inhumane acts as a crime against humanity; outrages upon personal dignity as a war crime; rape as a crime against humanity and a war crime; forcible transfer as a crime against humanity; persecution as a crime against humanity; torture as a crime against humanity and a war crime; cruel treatment as a war crime; attempted murder as a crime against humanity and a war crime.

For further information on this case, check here.

For further information, please contact Fadi El Abdallah, Spokesperson and Head of Public Affairs Unit, International Criminal Court, by telephone at: +31 (0)70 515-9152 or +31 (0)6 46448938 or by e-mail at: fadi.el-abdallah@icc-cpi.int

You can also follow the Court’s activities on TwitterFacebookTumblrYouTubeInstagram and Flickr


[MARUAH] International Criminal Court Review Process in 2021 – Assessing and implementing the experts’ recommendations

13 May 2021

The ICC Review Mechanism

In early 2021 States Parties appointed Ambassador Paul Van Den Ijssel (Netherlands), based in The Hague, and Ambassador Michael Kanu (Sierra Leone), based in New York, as the State party representatives heading the ICC Review Mechanism.  States parties also appointed three regional country focal points: Bangladesh, Chile, and Poland.

The Mechanism is mandated to:

  • Submit a proposal for the categorization of the IER recommendations by 30 April, to the ASP Bureau.
  • Submit a proposed action plan to the Bureau by 30 June. The proposed action plan should:

–   Allocate the IER recommendations to the relevant court organs and ASP thematic focal points, facilitations, and working groups for their considerations. The Mechanism is expected to deal with the rest of the recommendations;

–   Prioritize the IER recommendations; and

–   Set deadlines for the consideration of the IER recommendations.

  • Regularly brief States Parties on its progress and submit a report on the review process to the ASP ahead of the 20th session of the Assembly of States Parties.

Proposal for the categorization of the IER recommendations

On 29 April 2021, the ICC Review Mechanism submitted its “Proposal for the categorization of the IER recommendations and remaining review issues” to the ASP Bureau, together with an Introductory note.

The Review Mechanism also published the Comments on categorization submitted by:


Background

A review of the ICC’s performance for a strengthened Court and Rome Statute System

In 2018 the Rome Statute celebrated its 20th anniversary. States Parties, Court officials, civil society and other key stakeholders reflected then on the achievements and the challenges of the ICC and the Rome Statute system. The ICC’s own shortcomings had become evident: limited success of the Prosecution in the courtroom, with a low conviction rate, taking into account the number of cases investigated; limited impact in the countries concerned; lack of an adequate level of cooperation; among others.That triggered discussions on steps to strengthen the Courtand the Rome Statute system.

In 2019, this led to the launch of a review of the functioning of the court’s and the Rome Statute system.

For more information, please visit https://www.coalitionfortheicc.org/review-icc-and-rome-statute-system.