Making your postal ballot count

25 March 2025

Overseas Singaporeans were allowed to vote by post for the first time in the 2023 Presidential Election. Unfortunately, over 40% of postal ballots were disallowed, and even among the ballot papers that were accepted, 4% of those were rejected due to irregularities in the marking of the ballot paper.

The government has not announced any changes to the postal balloting procedure since the 2023 election, and its reply to a PQ raised by NCMP Hazel Poa suggests that they will not make any major changes to the procedure before the parliamentary elections this year.

While ELD released detailed instructions and an instructional video for postal voters in 2023, the process is a multi-step process, and as evidenced by the high rejection rate of postal ballots, it is not as simple as voting in a polling station in Singapore.

Postal ballot not received in time

Under the law, postal ballots must be received by ELD within 10 days after polling day. Registered overseas voters can download their postal ballots from ELD’s website the day after nomination day and the ballots must be mailed out before polling day. That means that registered overseas voters have only eight (8) days to download their postal ballots, decide who to vote for, and post their ballots. In addition, the ballot must be received by ELD in Singapore within ten (10) days after polling day. Given the vagaries of weather, postal strikes and just general deterioration in postal services around the world, postal voters should post their ballots as early as possible to make sure that their votes are counted.

Unfortunately, just dropping off the ballot at the nearest post box is not enough. Voters must ensure that their return envelopes have a legible postmark, dated at least one day before polling day. This leads to the biggest problem that postal voters face:

Faint, illegible or missing postmarks

ELD provides business return reply envelopes for voters, but many countries do not routinely postmark business reply envelopes, so many voters had their ballots rejected in 2023 because their return envelopes were not postmarked at all. ELD is aware of this issue and does recommend that postal voters apply stamps to the return envelopes so that there will be a postmark to provide evidence of the date of posting.

Voters must also take into account that some postal services do not pick up mail from all post boxes every day. And even if the mail is picked up, it may not be postmarked until it is processed at a sorting facility several days later. This means that even if the return envelope is dropped in a post box on time, it may not be postmarked until after the deadline, resulting in the ballot being disallowed.

As mentioned earlier, overseas voters should post their ballots as early as possible to prevent their ballots from being rejected. Those who want to be extra kiasu may even go to a post office personally to ask for their return envelopes to be manually postmarked by counter staff.

I do not advise using an express mail or courier service to return the postal ballot papers. If the official ELD return envelope is enclosed inside an envelope provided by the courier company, there will not be any postmarks on the official return envelope itself. Those ballots would then be rejected because elections officials are only allowed to look at postmarks on the official return envelope.

Follow the instructions carefully

As mentioned above, ELD gives very detailed instructions on how to print, mark and post postal ballots. Even seemingly minor deviations from the instructions may cause ballots to be rejected. For example,

  • Printing the ballot paper and return evelope double-sided on the same sheet of paper – The return envelope must be separated from the ballot paper before counting. Don’t try to save paper. Print single-sided on two sheets of paper, otherwise the vote will be rejected.
  • Signing the ballot paper – Any ballot paper which is marked such that the voter can be identified will be rejected. Do not sign the ballot paper. Sign only on the outside of the return envelope.
  • No signature or incorrect signature on the return envelope – The return envelope must be signed, and the signature must match the sample provided to ELD during registration.
  • Two ballot papers placed inside the same return envelope – These will be not be accepted. Each voter must place his or her ballot paper inside separate return envelopes and sign them individually.

The rules may seem to be nitpicky but they are important because elections officials have to be sure that ballots received are from the correct person, and have not been tampered with. Apart from written instructions, ELD also provides an instructional video to guide the voter through the process, so voters should follow the instructions to make sure their vote is counted.

Registering as an overseas voter

The mechanics of postal balloting are moot if the overseas Singaporean is not registered as an overseas voter. Overseas voters must re-register as an overseas voter every time that the Electoral Registers are revised, and since the Registers were revised today, that means that all overseas Singaporeans must register as overseas voters if they want to vote, even if they were registered previously. This can be done online on ELD’s website up to three days after the writ of election is issued. During registration, overseas voters can register to vote at overseas polling stations, or to vote by post. In either case, if the voter is physically present in Singapore on polling day, he or she can still vote in person at a local polling station.


Winners of Essay Contest for Young Singaporeans on Their Vision For Singapore Beyond Lee Kuan Yew

8 September 2023

Maruah is pleased to announce the winners of our essay contest for young Singaporeans on their vision for a Singapore beyond Lee Kuan Yew. The contest was organised to encourage young Singaporeans to evaluate Mr Lee’s legacy and consider how they would retain or modify his legacy for Singapore.

Eight years after Mr Lee’s death, the imprint of Lee Kuan Yew can still be clearly seen in public discourse on many issues. For example, the controversy over the renting of colonial bungalows to Government ministers, the arrest of a Government minister on suspicion of corruption, and even the resignations of People’s Action Party (PAP) and opposition Members of Parliament over extra-marital affairs are legacies of Mr Lee’s determination that politicians in Singapore be whiter-than-white. The Elected Presidency was also a creation of LKY, and just by voting in the recent Presidential Election, all Singaporeans are participating in a system that Mr Lee established.

Almost a decade after his death, Mr Lee’s legacy remains ubiquitious in Singapore but the World does not stay still, and as he himself would have recognised, Singaporeans, especially young Singaporeans have to think of how they would retain or modify LKY’s legacy to meet their needs and aspirations in a rapidly-changing environment. This was the question posed to participants in the contest and the judging panel selected four winners, in no particular order – Lam Yu Han, Luke Lee, Desiree Leong and Wesley Ng. 

Lam Yu Han, a 23-year-old full-time National Serviceman who volunteers in the community and has an interest in social issues and politics. Lam is grateful for the economic prosperity and security that Mr Lee’s leadership brought to Singapore, but is also perturbed by the Out-of-Bounds (OB) markers the Government places on media and even on individuals who choose self-censorship as the path of least resistance. In his view, Mr Lee will only be able to rest peacefully in his grave when Singapore has both a government that has the competence and legitmacy to take on the challenges facing the nation, and a society that can discuss ideas freely and intelligently.

Luke Lee, 22, was also in National Service when he entered the essay contest as a means of educating himself to examine issues wholistically and objectively. Growing up, Luke had only been taught the positive aspects of Lee Kuan Yew (LKY), and only later in life became aware of more questionable aspects such as LKY’s use of the Internal Security Act against political opponents, and eugenic policies including the Graduate Mothers’ Scheme. Luke’s wish is that people can express divergent opinions without fear, and wrote the essay to meet his own aspiration and as an encouragement to others.

Desiree Leong has been working with Humanitarian Organisation for Migration Economics (HOME) for seven years where she has seen first-hand that migrant worker issues are often at the coalface of broader issues facing society. Ms Leong feels strongly that this country is her home and where she wants to make a difference. She believes that for Singapore to move forward together as an inclusive society, we will have to come to terms with the past so as to truly make it our past.

Wesley Ng is an undergraduate in Poltical Science & South East Asian Studies at the National University of Singapore (NUS) with an interest in the politics of South East Asia. Mr Ng hopes that Singapore will continue and cherish the parts of LKY’s legacy that reinforce Singaporeans’ belief that their nation can continue to remain united regardless of race, language or religion, and to succeed against the odds. At the same time, he argues that Singapore today calls for a different style of governance – One that recognizes that while the post-LKY leaders need strong public trust to succeed, the leaders also need to trust that the citizenry are aware of what is best for Singapore and of what Singapore needs to succeed.

These four essays are only a small sample of the views that young Singaporeans have on LKY’s legacy and of the Singapore that they hope to see in the future.  Maruah hopes all Singaporeans will continue to engage in meaningful discussions of the home that they wish to live in and to build in the future.


MARUAH Essay Contest for Young Singaporeans on their vision for a Singapore beyond Lee Kuan Yew

30 April 2023

As the Singapore government prepares to observe the 100th anniversary of Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s birth, Maruah seeks to encourage young Singaporeans to reflect on Mr Lee’s contributions to Singapore and to articulate a vision for Singapore beyond Lee Kuan Yew.

Mr Lee Kuan Yew has loomed larger than anyone else over the nation and people of Singapore ever since the early 1950s when he emerged as a lawyer for trades unions and anti-colonial activists. Over the course of his 31-year tenure as Prime Minister and eventual transition into the role of Minister Mentor and elder statesman, Mr Lee’s policies and personality have shaped Singapore. Mr Lee’s mark can still be seen in our economic development, physical transformation, social policy and authoritarian style of governance today.

Mr Lee stepped down as Prime Minister in 1990 and a generation of Singaporeans has grown up in the 33 years since then. This generation of Singaporeans has benefited from Mr Lee’s legacy and will shape the future of Singapore in the years to come. As the 100th anniversary of Mr Lee’s birth approaches, Maruah would like to encourage young Singaporeans to evaluate Mr Lee’s legacy and consider how they would retain or modify his legacy for Singapore in the future.

Maruah invites Singaporeans born in or after 1990 to submit an essay of up to 2,000 words on the topic:

“What does Mr Lee Kuan Yew mean to you and what is your vision for a post-Lee Kuan Yew Singapore?”

A total of six $1,000 prizes will be awarded, with three $1,000 prizes reserved for contributors who have never enrolled in a local or overseas university. All participants must be Singapore citizens born in 1990 or later.

The essays will be judged based on factors including relevance to the topic, critical thinking, originality of ideas and depth of knowledge. The decision of the judging panel will be final.

All submissions must be submitted online at this link and received by 15 July 2023 11.59pm.

Winning essays will be published on Maruah’s website and social media.